Same thoughts….different years. sigh
The First Three Weeks
Early Hours:
I’m climbing back from a hole that was black
But I’m not exactly sure what I think about that
Inside & Outside:
I tell them all what they all want to hear
But I’m not really sure that I make myself clear
Setbacks:
To fix my soul, each day I plan – one tiny little goal
But then it seems each day I fix just what I can’t control
The System:
They told me all that I must do
They gave me meds so I won’t be blue
But when I try to carry through
They say “Oh no we are not for you”
*****
Poor Eliza’s dear old Alfred P
Was in some ways exactly like me
Yet he was happy, he did not want more,
So unlike him I do deplore
That I am part of the undeserving poor
…
View original post 269 more words
Well i’m still standing but…can’t say as much for the other guy. He trys! dru
MY PARTNER AND ME, WE’RE LIKE AN OLD RUN DOWN FARM
MOST BUILDINGS NEED PAINTIN’
THERE’S NO FOUNDATION FOR OUR BARN
THE HEN HOUSE ROOF IS LEAKING
AND OUR BANISTERS NEED SANDIN’
OUR MORTGAGE IS PAST DUE
BUT WE’RE STILL STANDIN’
HIS PUMP IT STOPPED WORKIN’
AND MY WELL RAN DRY
BUT I DECIDED TO STICK
SO HERE AM I……!
I FIND MANY SIMILARITIES BETWEEN MYSELF AND THAT OLD CODGER
Oh yes Horace Rumpole, he brightened my life when I found him.
I actually discovered him through Mortimer’s short stories in the 1970s, although they evidently were subsequent to the BBC series but at that time I did not “receive” the BBC and was unaware of this
“Freedom Fighter”
until the books were published.
That “Old Bailey Hack” definitely agreed with Henrik Ibsen;
“Never wear your best trousers when you go out to fight for freedom and truth”.
Rumpole and I have so much in common, our similarities are very near.
I too have occasionally been seen smoking a small cheroot
with cigar ash trailing down my waistcoat.
Oh yes, I certainly have the protruding stomach for that (or as I like to call it the shelf that carries my boobs)…again apologies but this time to Maya Angelou …but in regards…
View original post 208 more words
Many of us bloggers have been ranting about the amount of civilians that are killed in our many, many wars…..how the US tries to justify or just plain deny that these casualties are actually happening.
Of course we could always write them off as “collateral damage”…..anything to get the “bad guy”, right?
I know there can be no rules in a war….well that is just not right…there are rules ans a civilized nation should abide be the set of rules in war.
Rule 1. The parties to the conflict must at all times distinguish between civilians and combatants. Attacks may only be directed against combatants. Attacks must not be directed against civilians.
But what if the nation makes up its own rules for civilians in a war zone?
Though the Pentagon has mostly issued blanket denials whenever they’re caught killing civilians in airstrikes against ISIS targets anyhow, officials say their…
View original post 242 more words